A software information on Profesionals physician practices, health facilities were brought online in July 2015. I present in my post, the software that can allow certain personal excesses. rating of health professionals and health institutions. When the Information Act comes into force, this software is to know in his existence in the world of health. We use the patient as a listening and informants to whom the network highways are open. First, I recall the historical context of a decree that countered the prosecution could have been used. Secondly, I leave the site by presenting its designer Toulouse to 100,000 euros, and in a third section I give some tracks of reflections and questions.
- Historical background of a decree in 2005 countered before publication:
In 2005, the confidentiality and anonymity of users’ testimonials Health professionals or appeared to protect fundamental trials against health professionals, physicians being more exposed.
A decree implementing Article 16 of the 2004 Act was being drafted by the HAS Service Accreditation of specialty doctors tell risks, ie, those most exposed to damages (see list).
I demonstrated in an article in my blog CDM, at the head of this service had been appointed a widow burdened by a medical error upon the person of her husband, described as “DOT”. the woman said “make it clear to their physicians mistake” and made it to 6 exam.
Project Manager in his service, international comparison of the mission on Accreditation on reporting of incidents was entrusted to me, I discovered during my literature searches that Australia review its laws concerning the accreditation and reporting, as they had failed to mention the privacy and anonymity of incidents deferrals or medical accidents, which had not failed to judicialize profession (suicide, closure of establishments, personnel layoffs reported through this, aides shelved …). the refusal to integrate these Australian precautions in the order, which would have allowed anyone to denounce, vilify, make denunciations, was incomprehensible. I flatly refused as though the user representative appointed to this position and the director d ela HAS preparing an implementing decree that would allow them to have medical details to know, for operational purposes.
I remind the rapporteur of this Act to the National Assembly was Prof. JM DUBERNARD, and finding fault with the HAS listening, I informed the Australian discovery because it could be criticized by the French doctors have missed a decree that exposes them to slander and even lawsuits. It was not his intention, as rapporteur of the Act. Brave man, when the decree was released in September 2005, he decided not to let this text in the state and made me call to transmit data from the Australian Act and the fruits of my research. What I did on 1 September 2005. The decree will not come out. It will be reworked and will be published in July 2006 for application to the Accreditation of doctors. The director of the HAS was going to retire in 2006 was Alain COULOMB. He did not spare me, I was delegated staff of the High Authority, but despite this, for 6 months, juqu January 16, 2006, I experienced bullying and bullying on a phrase still rings in my ears. But forget the sexist phrases to devote ourselves to the subject.
Ten years after that struggle to preserve this decree, I just saw on FR3 screens Midi-Pyrénées show a man with “a nice face” that has a website where everyone can write his opinion on a health care facility and the subject is clear, “note doctors”. This makes me rethink that old story of the HAS and tell me that if someone takes the trouble to get in front of his computer on this site is to tell his experience what is normal so far, but may, without realizing it go further by releasing intimate details, medical or not, doctor’s name, department, nurse, establishment and thus without moderation tell to whom? This is the question I ask because medical confidentiality can not be shared and what qualification the person reading these stories in order to sort out the false from the true. So I alert health professionals, knowing That a warden said he was pleased to know well what is happening in his establishment. It was the director of the Pasteur Clinqiue in Toulouse, thereby testifying on FR3.
We may think that this is an information site, users releasing their words without knowing the USE can be made. Défouloir. Investigate and inquire. The medical profession is beginning to get tired of being the scapegoat of control systems. Especially as the Information Act recently adopted in France has breached regarding the means of information.
2 – Presentation of the site Hospitalidée:
“ free speech of patients and facilitate their decision in choosing establishments ”
The website for users to rate physicians and institutions.
HOSPITALIDEE!
Laban © Mathilde / France 3 Midi-Pyrénées Loic Raynal, the founder of the website Hospitalidee
Site Excerpts:.
“HOSPITALIDEE offers anonymous and secure view of patients allow other patients to move more easily to the right health service.
We also give the possibility to chat on the platform with a patient whose opinion calls.
The opinion necessarily relate to the organization of care and not on people (but you can quote the doctor to make a dedication to him!).
cardiology, rheumatology, urology, neurology, ophthalmology, osteopathy, radiology … All services are concerned.
True tool of health democracy, contributes to improving HOSPITALIDEE the quality of care and services by promoting the expression of patients.
Everyone’s experience is important.
Hospitalization, consultation, outpatient, emergency or maternity, regardless of your experience, your opinion counts “
FR3 Midi-Pyrenees:
“ Health is it an economy like another? Yes, Loic Raynal. This Hospitalidée Toulouse has created a website dedicated to advice patients on hospitals, clinics or doctors encountered. Internet allows to note the hotels, restaurants or the quality of an airline … Now one can also assess health facilities and practitioners. A Toulousain has created a website for he says “free speech of patients and facilitate their decision in the choice of institutions.” In practice this results in a rating system “ By Laurence Boffet / Published on 07.30.2015. | 7:14 p.m., updated on 30/07/2015. | 7:14 p.m. FR3
3 – Reflections
France
- have been an adopted Renseigenement Act
- was less and less doctors,
- you have a desertification of the profession
- you have a geographical access to care inequality
- we have a policy of austerity,
- 24 000 migrants were expected to be integrated into the healthcare system,
- we have local hospitals that close,
- we have near maternity hospitals are threatened with closure,
- you have a life span that extends
- we have Doctors paid to third-party payer,
- apparently were lawyers,
- it will apparently “free speech” in allowing free expression on a site who will make confidential and anonymous statements that will not do. The designers of the site will retain the original declaration for them.
- apparently it is free for registrants …
- etc .. .
He had to think, they did, to outsource the collection of anonymous opinions or informers through a freely accessible website anywhere in the world. The prosecution is running on a website that meets the critèques accredited software by HAS (GALILEO).
“Note DOCTORS AND HOSPITALS” seems to be the new Toulouse concept. To rate would require a rating grid.? Are the doctors informed? all specialties? What looks can they relate this rating? What feedback do they have? What right of reply have? The e-reputation-it is not at stake? Medical confidentiality? The evidence
To quote Anne Roumanoff: “ We do not say we all” for investing € 100,000 in a company to collect free testimony funds lost, it questioned the true intentions. I do not think too sponsorship or representation of users in institutions as proposed by the certification of health facilities every 4 years. Invited to participate in self-assessment of health facilities groups, associations of users struggled with the task.
Hospitalidée, a website available to any service provided to patients? Who benefits from this knowing that the reporting POINT class health facilities each year, HAS visit schools every 4 years, the ARS are piloting stratégiez health by region, the Councils of the Order are available to any claim . Ten years after my warning note to the Minister of Health to make the confidential and anonymous incident deferrals by decree this website bypasses all systems in place regulations to give opinions on the existing system and its actors .
What would you say if a website to allow “note”, police stations and the police, the other schools and teachers, another Post, yet another nursing, why not a site to note the factors ….? Will the doctors still accept to let “note” hussar? By which on the other side of the screen. With which permissions, this site has he been able to open officially on canvas with the inventory already established institutions related to listing of a so-called certification HAS?
Overall, “intelligence” obtained by any means is operating in our country, in the name of so-called freedom of expression may violate other freedoms. The Germans have always confessed not being able to win the war only through denunciation and typically French denunciation who delivered the innocent. Health professionals, all trades combined, for he must know their jobs back.
In France, it has more doctors, but we have ideas for Internet anyone can ” learn “on doctors and health facilities?
No comments:
Post a Comment